Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Strengths, Weaknesses, Issues, Performance, Opinions – In-Depth Analysis

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Strengths, Weaknesses, Issues, Performance, Opinions – In-Depth Analysis

The Merida Mission 2026 (the third generation of the model) marks a significant evolution in the performance-oriented and competition gravel bicycle segment, positioning itself as a bridge between endurance road bikes (Scultura Endurance) and more adventurous gravel bikes (Silex). The bicycle was specifically conceived as a tool for the Gravel World Series, prioritizing speed, aerodynamic efficiency, and responsiveness over load capacity or maximum tire clearance.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Construction Quality

The construction quality is geared towards excellence and competition. The CF4 carbon frame (used in the top-tier versions) guarantees structural rigidity and lightness. The fiber layup and surface finish are meticulously executed, especially in the higher-end builds.

The engineering is dictated by aerodynamics, with tube profiles that echo Merida's road models, the Reacto and Scultura, to minimize air resistance. The overall quality is perceived as high and performance-focused.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Frame

The CF4 carbon frame is characterized by aggressive, race-oriented geometries.

Geometry and Fit: The fit is intentionally similar to a road racing bike. The frame's Stack (vertical distance) is significantly reduced (up to 38 mm less than the Silex and 15 mm less than the Scultura Endurance), and the Reach is close to the values of the Scultura road bike, positioning the cyclist in a more elongated and lower posture, ideal for aerodynamic efficiency and racing. This frame is ideal for those seeking a "slam your stem" position.

Chainstays: A key feature is the short rear chainstay length (419 mm), which is only 1 mm longer than the all-road endurance bike, giving the machine exceptional responsiveness and rapid acceleration.

Tire Clearance: Merida opted for a maximum stated tire clearance of 40 mm (with a minimum 6 mm distance from the frame), a choice that initially appears conservative but is functional to maintaining fast road geometries. However, in practice (as confirmed by World Champion Mohorič), the bicycle accepts tires up to 45 mm (tested by the Merida R&D team with Schwalbe and sponsored riders with Continental), still ensuring good clearance even on wet and muddy terrain.

Bottom Bracket and UDH: The bottom bracket has been lowered for increased stability, and the frame is UDH (Universal Derailleur Hanger) compatible.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Component Assembly

The assemblies integrate high technology and aerodynamics. Total cable integration in the frame and handlebar (TEAM SL GR1P carbon cockpit in top versions) ensures a clean front-end and aero performance.

High-end models are equipped with benchmark groupsets like SRAM Red XPLR AXS or Shimano GRX Di2, featuring light and high-performing carbon wheels. Top versions (Mission 10K) can be fitted with ultra-wide wheels (such as the Zipp 303 Xplr with 32 mm internal width), which, despite being wide, make the tire more voluminous and help maximize the nominal 40 mm limit.

Lack of Mounts: The absence of multiple mounts for bags and heavy loads on the frame and fork (which are present on the Silex) confirms that the Mission is a race machine, not a bikepacking one.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Comfort

Despite the aggressive setup, comfort is managed through carbon engineering and tire choice. The controlled flex of the CF4 carbon fiber and the 27.2 mm seatpost effectively damp vibrations.

However, the riding posture is that of a racing bike, which can be demanding for cyclists with less flexibility or for long rides at a leisurely pace. Comfort is therefore a result of damping technology, not relaxed geometry.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Handling

The handling characteristics are the determining factor. The bike was designed to offer a fast road bike feel, regardless of the surface.

Agility and Precision: The short chainstays (419 mm) and the relatively steeper head tube angle (72∘) compared to adventure gravel bikes make the Mission extremely agile, responsive, and precise in corners and during changes of direction.

Stability and Wheelbase: Stability is maintained thanks to the lowered bottom bracket. The total wheelbase is significantly shorter (about 69 mm less than the Silex), allowing the cyclist to achieve a road-like behavior reminiscent of the Scultura racing bike.

Riding Sensation: The bicycle accelerates exceptionally quickly and efficiently, converting pedaling power into forward motion with very little dispersion. This responsiveness makes it stimulating but also requires increased focus on handling.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Performance

Performance is the primary objective.

Speed and Efficiency: Advanced aerodynamics and torsional stiffness of the frame (from the head tube to the bottom bracket) maximize speed on mixed surfaces. The bike is among the fastest in its category.

Actual Weight: The weight is remarkably low. The entry-level version (Mission 4000, approx. 2,700 €) weighs about 10 kg, while the top-of-the-range version (Mission 10K, approx. 8,400 €, with SRAM Red XPLR AXS, powermeter, and carbon wheels) registers only 7.72 kg (size M, without pedals), making it one of the lightest gravel bikes on the market and an excellent value compared to competitors with similar specifications.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths

Speed and Efficiency: Lightning-fast acceleration and road bike-like aerodynamics.

Competitive Weight: Extremely light, with the top version at only 7.72 kg.

Aggressive Fit: Stack/Reach geometry ideal for road-experienced cyclists seeking an aerodynamic and low position.

Responsive Handling: High agility and precision thanks to the short rear chainstays.

"Real" Tire Clearance: Despite the nominal 40 mm limit, it comfortably accepts 45 mm tires, sufficient for most race courses.

Weaknesses

Postural Comfort: The riding position is very aggressive, potentially uncomfortable for long rides or less-trained cyclists.

Limited Tire Clearance (Theoretical Maximum): 45 mm is the practical limit, excluding the use of super-voluminous tires for deep mud or extreme singletrack terrain.

Complex Maintenance: Total cable integration makes mechanical interventions more laborious.

Not Versatile: Unsuitable for bikepacking or heavy loads due to the lack of dedicated mounts.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Advice

Ideal User: The Mission is specifically recommended for road cyclists who want a gravel racing or high-speed machine.

Tire Setup: Do not be misled by the nominal limit; if tackling rougher terrain, fit 700 x 45c tires to maximize grip and comfort.

Position: If unfamiliar with a race fit, a period of adaptation to the low and elongated posture may be required.

Value: Consider the excellent value-for-money offered on high-end models, which include World Tour-level components and lightness at competitive prices.

Merida Mission 2026: Review, Test, Alternatives

The gravel segment oriented towards racing and pure speed is growing. The main alternatives to consider include:

Specialized Crux: Famous for its lightness and aggressive geometries, offering a responsive ride feel and a greater emphasis on design cleanliness.

Cannondale SuperSix EVO SE/CX: Leverages the EVO road design, adapted for the discipline, with an excellent combination of lightness and rigidity.

Giant Revolt Advanced Pro: A race bike with excellent aerodynamic qualities, but often with greater tire clearance than the Mission.

Pinarello Grevil: Characterized by a markedly aero design and high performance, typical of the Italian brand.

Merida Silex (Internal Alternative): If a versatile Merida, suitable for bikepacking, with greater comfort and more tire space is desired, the Silex remains the ideal alternative.

In conclusion, the Merida Mission 2026 is a gravel bike that has made a precise choice: to maximize speed and race performance, while sacrificing maximum load capacity and tire clearance for extreme tires.